Price: FREE Having trouble? Try right-clicking & saving target as...
Product User Rating:
3.5 / 4.0
Overall Quality
3.7
Accuracy
3.7
Practicality
3.5
Thoroughness
3.3
Creativity
3.8
Clarity
3.3
3 total vote(s)
Price: FREE Having trouble? Try right-clicking & saving target as...
(s) = seller, (c) = customer
Posted on: September 15, 2008Posted by:
Mcullen(c)
Symmetry is a great addition to the algebra pedagogy. I teach both the axiomatic and visual methods to my HS classes. I allow the students to choose the method that is easiest for them during a test. Most of them choose the visual method because it requires less symbolic logic and it takes less time to obtain a solution.
Posted on: September 21, 2008Reply by:George Mondras (s)
My teaching style is similar; it has definitely benefited the at-risk students
Posted on: September 15, 2008Posted by:
Donald Totten(c)
I am now retired and formerly taught mathematics in HS and Middle school. I am very impressed with Algebra Through Symmetry and regret that it was not available during my teaching years. Many of the students that I taught had extreme difficulty with the traditional axiomatic method. Based upon outside classroom contact with current students, they learn algebra quickly and easily by using the visual method.
Posted on: September 21, 2008Reply by:George Mondras (s)
I was raised in the axiomatic method but my experience has taught that the only way to reach the at-risk students is to simplify the procedures. I read The Elements more than 40 years ago, so when I was looking for an easier method, visual algebra surfaced from memory.
Posted on: November 23, 2006Posted by:
Bruce Will(c)
If you find that your students just don't "get" algebra by classical methods, this approach may lead them to a fundamental understanding.
Mathematical ability is normally distributed in the K14 student population consequently most students do not learn algebra if the axiomatic method is used exclusively. I teach both methods in parallel, that is, the students are required to solve each equation twice by employing the axiomatic mantra, “whatever you do to one side of an equation you must do to the other“, and the visual mantra, “rewrite the equation until both sides look the same.” Such a mathematical pedagogy more closely matches the profile of a typical class and enables many more students to learn algebra.
Posted on: September 8, 2006Posted by:
Dennis Ashendorf(c)
I use this approach in my continuing education program in high school. The standard way failed for these students. The symmetry approach baffles them somewhat, but they also find it fun (relatively) to try this. I consider this paper too short for a regular class, but great for shorter classes that can only cover some standards in depth, such as California.
Most of my students appreciate an intuitive method that enables them to do and understand algebra, many for the first time. I teach both methods in parallel, explicit-axiomatic and implicit-visual. One of my teaching techniques consists in demonstrating that every example problem in the textbook, which uses the axiomatic method exclusively, can be solved more easily through the use of numerical techniques that produce symmetry. The state-mandated criteria require the solution of at least 70% of the algebra problems to pass with a "C" or better. The criteria do not require that the students solve the equations in the most difficult way possible. The visual method is within the scope of any student skilled in arithmetic and may be the only means available to "rescue" those students whose circumstance place them at high risk of failure in abstract mathematics.