Teachers Pay Teachers

# 5 DIFFERENTIATED FRACTION PERFORMANCE TASKS **COMMON CORE ALIGNED** 4.NF.1

Subjects
Resource Types
Common Core Standards
Product Rating
4.0
File Type
PDF (Acrobat) Document File
2.55 MB   |   14 pages

### PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

Need to challenge your students? Want feedback on how your class is mastering the material you teach? Looking for more than a standard multiple choice assessment? Take your math instruction to the next level and get your students excited about math! PERFORMANCE TASKS ARE WHAT YOUR STUDENTS NEED.

This purchase contains 5 differentiated geometry performance tasks. These performance tasks are aligned to Common Core Standards, while engaging and challenging students. Printables marked “A” are for students that need more reinforcement/practice, and option “B” is for independent students looking for a challenge.

These tasks are aligned to the following standards:
➥ 4.NF.1 - Explain why a fraction a/b is equivalent to a fraction (n × a)/(n × b) by using visual fraction models, with attention to how the number and size of the parts differ even though the two fractions themselves are the same size. Use this principle to recognize and generate equivalent fractions.
➥ 4.NF.2 - Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators, e.g., by creating common denominators or numerators, or by comparing to a benchmark fraction such as 1/2. Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two fractions refer to the same whole. Record the results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual fraction model.

These performance tasks are meant to access conceptual understanding, along with procedural understanding.

Need more performance tasks for the classroom? Check out the resources below.
Area and Perimeter Performance Tasks COMMON CORE ALIGNED 4.MD.3
5 DIFFERENTIATED FRACTION PERFORMANCE TASKS **COMMON CORE ALIGNED** 4.NF.1
Total Pages
14
Included
Teaching Duration
1 hour

4.0
Overall Quality:
4.0
Accuracy:
4.0
Practicality:
4.0
Thoroughness:
4.0
Creativity:
4.0
Clarity:
4.0
Total:
7 ratings