Whoops! Something went wrong.

Click here to refresh the page
69 Downloads

Design for an urban neighborhood in a decayed urban core

Design for an urban neighborhood in a decayed urban core
Design for an urban neighborhood in a decayed urban core
Design for an urban neighborhood in a decayed urban core
Design for an urban neighborhood in a decayed urban core
Design for an urban neighborhood in a decayed urban core
Design for an urban neighborhood in a decayed urban core
Design for an urban neighborhood in a decayed urban core
Design for an urban neighborhood in a decayed urban core
Product Rating
3.8
2 ratings
File Type

Word Document File

Be sure that you have an application to open this file type before downloading and/or purchasing.

115 KB|12 pages
Share
Product Description
JEFFERSON VILLAGE (Sixth Revision, 1985)

INTRODUCTION: The following design evolved between1975 and 1985 during a graduate seminar on small communities and utopian designs. It began as an example of the kind of paper the seminar members were expected to write by the end of the semester incorporating some of othe ideas covered in class and readings. Through discussions, criticisms, and suggestions received over ten years fthe design grew into what appeared to be a surprisingly workable project encompassing an unusuaoly broad range of social, economic, and politcal issues as well as the physical structure and layout of the community. Subsequent developments in computer technology, energy productionl and use, and urban farming over the past three deacdes seem to make it even more even more enticing as a fairly realistic proposal for urban development in a decaysed urban core. Fearing that the idieas might be lost among other unpublished paper, it is posted here in hopes that a few others may find it useful as boath an intellecuat exer4cise and possibly as a viable project.
Allan Feldt, Professor Emeritus, The University of Michigan

PROBLEM: To provide a livable residential environment in the decayed central city of a large metropolis which is safe, stable, socially heterogeneous, affordable, attractive, comfortable, and built at moderate urban residential densities. Criteria for evaluating proposed solutions should include:

1. The designer must be willing to live in the development.
2. The community should be highly self-reliant.
3. The community should accommodate persons at all stages of the life cycle.
4. It should attract and accommodate all social classes.
5. It should be small enough to allow a high degree of face-to-face contact and identity among residents.
6. Residents must be secure from physical violence, vandalism, and robbery in their homes and in their neighborhood.
7. The community must be self-governing but well integrated with other governments at city, state and national levels.
8. The community should be sufficiently attractive to create a moderate demand for membership by outsiders coupled with retaining a large proportion of its own descendants.
9. Gross density should be at least 25 persons per acre.
Total Pages
12 pages
Answer Key
N/A
Teaching Duration
2 days
Report this Resource
Loading...
FREE
Digital Download
More products from Allan G Feldt
Product Thumbnail
Product Thumbnail
Product Thumbnail
Product Thumbnail
Product Thumbnail
FREE
Digital Download
Teachers Pay Teachers

Teachers Pay Teachers is an online marketplace where teachers buy and sell original educational materials.

Learn More

Keep in Touch!

Sign up