# Graphing 4: Practice Making Bar Graphs & Analyzing Data - Independent Work

7th - 10th, Homeschool
Subjects
Standards
Resource Type
Formats Included
• PDF
• Activity
Pages
6 pages
Includes Easel Activity
This resource includes a ready-to-use interactive version of the PDF. Assign it to students to complete from any device. Easel by TpT is free to use! Learn more.

#### Also included in

1. The Deconstruct an Experiment (Critical Thinking) packets include Google doc versions and the Graphing with Content packets can be used as TpT Digital Activities.DECONSTRUCT AN EXPERIMENT BUNDLEStudents learn the basic structure of a controlled experiment by analyzing experiments done by their peers
\$17.00
\$19.33
Save \$2.33
2. COMPLETE UNIT ON CONTROLLED EXPERIMENTS, GRAPHING DATA AND DATA ANALYSISAll of the resources either have a Google doc version or can be used as a TpT Digital Activity.1. Three Lessons on Deconstructing the Parts of a Controlled Experiment - experimental questions, hypotheses, variables, data analysi
\$23.00
\$26.31
Save \$3.31
3. Each instructional worksheet has embedded directions - works great for independent/distance learning!This is a set of 5 mini-lessons/instructional worksheets that scaffold the skills of graphing and data analysis while building students’ background knowledge. Students will graph and analyze scientif
\$9.32
\$10.36
Save \$1.04

### Description

Practice Graphing & Analyzing Data II: To which country are Ruby-throated hummingbirds most likely to migrate?

This is lesson 4 of a series of 5 instructional worksheets that scaffold the skills of graphing and data analysis while building background knowledge. Rather than graphing meaningless data, your students will graph and analyze scientifically meaningful data based on real-world research on wild birds.

Skills and content for Practice Graphing & Analyzing Data II:

1. Scaffolding for making a double-bar graph; including prompts for choosing intervals and labeling axes.

2. Calculating percentages of a total and using data as evidence to support conclusions.

3. Experimental design analysis such as determining independent and dependent variables, variables held constant and forming research questions.

Instruction is built into the worksheet – Based on your students’ experience with graphing, analysis and understanding variables you can determine whether they can work independently or need direct instruction for this activity.

Continue to teach graphing, data analysis and experimental design, with increasing challenge, by getting all 5 worksheets:

1. Learning to Graph & Analyze Data I

When do Dark-Eyed Juncos Visit Bird Feeders?

2. Learning to Graph & Analyze Data II

How does the number of nesting pairs change from year to year?

3. Practice Graphing & Analyzing Data I

Do woodpeckers prefer seeds or suet?

4. Practice Graphing & Analyzing Data II

To which country are Ruby-throated hummingbirds most likely to migrate?

5. Assessment: Graphing & Analyzing Data

How far might a Peregrine falcon migrate?

Get all 5 lessons for a discount - go to Graphing with Content: 5 Lesson Packet

Total Pages
6 pages
Included
Teaching Duration
N/A
Report this Resource to TpT
Reported resources will be reviewed by our team. Report this resource to let us know if this resource violates TpT’s content guidelines.

### Standards

to see state-specific standards (only available in the US).
NGSSHS-LS2-2
Use mathematical representations to support and revise explanations based on evidence about factors affecting biodiversity and populations in ecosystems of different scales. Examples of mathematical representations include finding the average, determining trends, and using graphical comparisons of multiple sets of data. Assessment is limited to provided data.
NGSSHS-LS2-1
Use mathematical and/or computational representations to support explanations of factors that affect carrying capacity of ecosystems at different scales. Emphasis is on quantitative analysis and comparison of the relationships among interdependent factors including boundaries, resources, climate, and competition. Examples of mathematical comparisons could include graphs, charts, histograms, and population changes gathered from simulations or historical data sets. Assessment does not include deriving mathematical equations to make comparisons.
NGSSMS-LS2-1
Analyze and interpret data to provide evidence for the effects of resource availability on organisms and populations of organisms in an ecosystem. Emphasis is on cause and effect relationships between resources and growth of individual organisms and the numbers of organisms in ecosystems during periods of abundant and scarce resources.
NGSSMS-LS2-4
Construct an argument supported by empirical evidence that changes to physical or biological components of an ecosystem affect populations. Emphasis is on recognizing patterns in data and making warranted inferences about changes in populations, and on evaluating empirical evidence supporting arguments about changes to ecosystems.
Model with mathematics. Mathematically proficient students can apply the mathematics they know to solve problems arising in everyday life, society, and the workplace. In early grades, this might be as simple as writing an addition equation to describe a situation. In middle grades, a student might apply proportional reasoning to plan a school event or analyze a problem in the community. By high school, a student might use geometry to solve a design problem or use a function to describe how one quantity of interest depends on another. Mathematically proficient students who can apply what they know are comfortable making assumptions and approximations to simplify a complicated situation, realizing that these may need revision later. They are able to identify important quantities in a practical situation and map their relationships using such tools as diagrams, two-way tables, graphs, flowcharts and formulas. They can analyze those relationships mathematically to draw conclusions. They routinely interpret their mathematical results in the context of the situation and reflect on whether the results make sense, possibly improving the model if it has not served its purpose.