Question Exploration: Scientific Theory vs. Law

Question Exploration: Scientific Theory vs. Law
Question Exploration: Scientific Theory vs. Law
Question Exploration: Scientific Theory vs. Law
Question Exploration: Scientific Theory vs. Law
Grade Levels
Product Rating
Not yet rated
File Type
Word Document File
Be sure that you have an application to open this file type before downloading and/or purchasing.
0.09 MB   |   5 pages

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

Question Exploration Routine is an instructional methods that teachers can use to help a diverse student population understand a body of content information by carefully answering a critical question to arrive at a main idea answer. Students taught using the question exploration routine earned higher total test scores than did students taught using the lecture-discussion method. Personally, I use the Question Exploration Routine to figure out what I want to say and how I want to say it. I keeps my "Sage on the Stage" time limited to what fits onto 2 pages. This product includes the completed question exploration guide, and the student guide blanked except for vocabulary, scaffolding questions, and graphics already filled in.

This question exploration asks: How is a Scientific Theory Different from a Law? And Why are some scientific theories modified? This benchmark is taught at the beginning of the year.

It covers the following Next Generation Sunshine State Standard Benchmarks:
SWBAT
SC.7.N.2.1 Identify an instance from the history of science in which scientific knowledge has changed when new evidence or new interpretations are encountered.
SC.7.N.3.1 Recognize and explain the difference between theories and laws and give several examples of scientific theories and the evidence that supports them.
SC.8.N.3.2 explain why theories may be modified but are rarely discarded
SWBAT explain what a scientific theory is, and differentiate between a scientific theory and law
SC.912.N.1.2: Describe and explain what characterizes science and its methods.
SC.912.N.1.3: Recognize that the strength or usefulness of a scientific claim is evaluated through scientific argumentation, which depends on critical and logical thinking, and the active consideration of alternative scientific explanations to explain the data presented.
SC.912.N.1.6: Describe how scientific inferences are drawn from scientific observations and provide examples from the content being studied.
SC.912.N.1.7: Recognize the role of creativity in constructing scientific questions, methods and explanations.
LA.7.2.2.3 organize information to show understanding (e.g., representing main ideas within text
through charting, mapping, paraphrasing, summarizing, or comparing/contrasting)
LA.8.2.2.3 organize information to show understanding (e.g. representing key points within text through summarizing)
Total Pages
5
Answer Key
Included
Teaching Duration
45 Minutes

Average Ratings

N/A
Overall Quality:
N/A
Accuracy:
N/A
Practicality:
N/A
Thoroughness:
N/A
Creativity:
N/A
Clarity:
N/A
Total:
0 ratings
COMMENTS AND RATINGS:
Please log in to post a question.
PRODUCT QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS:
$1.87
Digital Download
ADD ONE TO CART
$1.87
Digital Download
ADD ONE TO CART
Question Exploration: Scientific Theory vs. Law
Question Exploration: Scientific Theory vs. Law
Question Exploration: Scientific Theory vs. Law
Question Exploration: Scientific Theory vs. Law