Reproductive Rights: Griswold v. Connecticut-Contraception and Privacy worksheet

Reproductive Rights: Griswold v. Connecticut-Contraception
Grade Levels
Resource Types
Product Rating
Not yet rated
File Type
Word Document File
Be sure that you have an application to open this file type before downloading and/or purchasing.
0.01 MB   |   1 pages

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

Reproductive Rights: Griswold v. Connecticut-Contraception and Privacy worksheet

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)
Contraception and Privacy
Should people be allowed access to drugs or devices designed to stop contraception, and thus be able to engage in sex without having to worry as much about pregnancy?
There have been many laws in the United States which prohibited the manufacture, distribution, transportation, or advertisement of such drugs and device.
Those laws were challenged and the most successful line or argument stated that such laws interfered with a sphere of privacy which belonged to the individual.
Facts of the Case:
Estelle Griswold was the Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut. Both she and the Medical Director for the League (Dr. Buxton) gave information, instruction, and other medical advice to married couples concerning birth control. Griswold and her colleague were convicted under a Connecticut law which criminalized the provision of counseling, and other medical treatment, to married persons for purposes of preventing conception and fined $100. A state appellate court and the Connecticut Supreme Court of Errors affirmed the convictions, whereupon defendants appealed to the U.S Supreme Court.
Connecticut prohibited the use of drugs or instruments to prevent conception, and the giving of assistance or counsel in their use. The laws in question had been enacted in 1879 (and originally written by P.T. Barnum, of circus fame):
Any person who uses any drug, medicinal article or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception shall be fined not less than fifty dollars or imprisoned not less than sixty days nor more than one year or be both fined and imprisoned.
Question:
Does the Constitution protect the right of marital privacy against state restrictions on a couple's ability to be counseled in the use of contraceptives?

TASK:
Read the Bill of Rights, are there any amendments that apply to this case? Explain.

Total Pages
1
Answer Key
N/A
Teaching Duration
N/A

Average Ratings

N/A
Overall Quality:
N/A
Accuracy:
N/A
Practicality:
N/A
Thoroughness:
N/A
Creativity:
N/A
Clarity:
N/A
Total:
0 ratings
COMMENTS AND RATINGS:
Please log in to post a question.
PRODUCT QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS:
$2.55
Digital Download
ADD ONE TO CART
$2.55
Digital Download
ADD ONE TO CART
Reproductive Rights: Griswold v. Connecticut-Contraception
Teachers Pay Teachers

Teachers Pay Teachers is an online marketplace where teachers buy and sell original educational materials.

Learn More

Keep in Touch!

Sign up