This is an excerpt from Amazon's popular line of Bossy Brocci Math and Big Science workbooks! [it's pronounced like "Brawsee"]
Printing should be done in Landscape and DOUBLE-SIDED, with the flip being along the 'SHORT' side.
Want MORE Power for your Dollar?
Give Brocci Bundles a Try before you buy!
To get the Bundles & Lessons directly connected or related to this product,
just copy & paste the following URL into a new Tab:
Most ELA, Math and Science teachers don't have
more than 100 State Tests on their shoulders
- and they enjoy anywhere from 60 to 90 minutes to teach their class.
But I've been whipping the State
while teaching an average of 110 students per year
- and with only about 38 minutes for science class!
It's a matter of public record:
I've crushed the State by 17 to 32 points, and by an average
of 23 points over a 5-year stretch.
And I'm North Carolina's 2016 Top-Scoring Science Teacher.
I've done this in a
High-Poverty, Title 1 school
in the Appalachian Mtns.
No Teaching Assistants,
No Remediation Class,
and No Test-Prep books or programs.
So what are my kids doing???
Bossy Brocci worksheets
1) Calculate & Record the Percent distribution in categories comparing Metal versus Nonmetal Specific Heat Capacity:
Percent of Nonmetals with a Lower Specific Heat Capacity than the Average Metal Specific Heat Capacity
Percent of Nonmetals with a Higher Specific Heat Capacity than the Average Metal Specific Heat Capacity
Percent of Metals with a Lower Specific Heat Capacity than the Average Nonmetal Specific Heat Capacity
Percent of Metals with a Higher Specific Heat Capacity than the Average Nonmetal Specific Heat Capacity
2) Answer 11 Multiple-choice questions based on their Calculations & Observations
3) Fill-in a Generalizations Table about Metals vs. Nonmetals' Specific Heat Capacity, with select phrases based on analysis of their Quantitative data
4) Fill-in a Total of 20 cells with Data & Text in 2 different Tables
5) Be compelled to present their work in a neat & orderly format
6) Be trained to know the trend between Metal and Nonmetal Specific Heat Capacity methodically & systematically
Many of my assessments (Quizzes and Tests) are single-spaced and double-sided.
I do this for multiple but important reasons:
1) I'm a Public School teacher and have a Print Quota or Maximum.
2) My school pays for the number of sheets we print and copy.
3) I don't like spending my life at the printer or in the dreaded copy-room,
wrestling with jammed machines, and stapling untold numbers of sheets together.
4) MOST students prefer being handed 1 or 2 sheets of paper,
instead of having 6 to 10 sheets dropped on their desk.
LESS sheets = LESS intimidation and anxiety
[psychologically, 50 questions on 1 sheet looks like less to do
than 50 questions spread over 4 sheets of paper].
Thus, I went with the "compact economy" car over the spacious, luxurious sedan to save:
So . . . now that you're aware of my "tight" or "compact" quizzes and tests ahead of time,
please reserve any down-grades on product CLARITY
for something such as a step or instruction that you were truly CONFUSED about
- - - NOT the lack of extra spacing and margins (which you knew up front weren't in there)
Afterall . . . it wouldn't be a fair, honest or accurate review
to condemn a car for not being a luxury sedan - - -
when in fact that car is plainly advertised as an economy car.
Printing should be done in Landscape and double-sided, with the flip being along the 'short' side
[Note: while water is indeed a Nonmetal substance, the purpose of this lesson is to provide the necessary foundation of Specific Heat Capacity, that then allows kids to better understand its significance with Water in the subsequent Lesson 08. This Lesson also appears in Big Science 3; it's offered here for continuity and categorization]
As far as GENERALIZING about Metals versus Nonmetals through hands-on inquiry . . .
It's overrated and inefficient for mastering Fundamental science knowledge (says the Science Teacher in me),
and it's often erroneous or illegitimate in its powers of generalization or conclusion (says the Organic Chemist in me).
For example, we science teachers have been known to put out a sample of copper, aluminum, rubber and cork. The students then test, say, electrical conductivity. After the contrived outcome, it's proclaimed: "You've discovered Metals are better Conductors than Nonmetals!", or "This proves Metals beat Nonmetals in Conductivity!"
No, it doesn't.
Our students can't make viable conclusions or generalizations based on "experiments" that lack repetition (depth), and adequate sample size or diversity (breadth).
Most of science, medicine, jurisprudence, the insurance business - and so much more - is based on Generalization. But generalizations are predicated on a heaping pile of inductive evidence.
All that the above "experiment" proves is that Copper and Aluminum are better at conducting electricity than rubber and cork.
What if instead of Copper and Aluminum, we used just two of the nearly 67% of metals whose electrical conductivities are actually LOWER THAN a supplied sample of the NONmetal Phosphorus? Would we want our students concluding that NONmetals are, in general, better conductors than Metals?? Imagine what your students would come away thinking about Metal versus Nonmetal THERMAL conductivity, after slipping Diamond in for one of the Nonmetals!
Of course, we could (and should) preface such quick & dirty "experiments" with, "what you're about to see isn't universal, but merely indicative or representative of the general trend between Metals and Nonmetals."
Thus, my approach is to enable students to draw accurate conclusions and make legitimate generalizations - by using ALL the data from ALL the elements. It's still inquiry, just database or statistical inquiry.
I've already done the tedious sorting and counting.
Your students will now calculate the fully-representative Percent distributions.
Your students still discover or reveal evidence and trends about Metals and Nonmetals.
Your students can now draw the accurate conclusions and make the legitimate generalizations that good Science is built upon.
And you just saved yourself a lot of time and headache!
Science Chemistry Physical Science Water's Unique Special Physical Properties Polar Water's Polarity Water's Hydrogen Bonding Hydrogen-Bonding between Water Molecules Water's Cohesion Cohesion between Water Molecules Adhesion Water's Capillary Action Capillary Action of Water Melting Point Boiling Point Water's Boiling Point Colligative Properties Heating Graph of Water Water's Heating Curve Phase Change Phase Change Diagram Phase Changes Water's Density Density of Water Density Anomaly Density Inversion Water's Density Anomaly Inversion Water's Surface Tension Measuring Surface Tension Water's Specific Heat Capacity Water's Latent Heat Enthalpy of Fusion Water's Latent Heat Enthalpy of Vaporization Dissolving Homogenous Mixture Solution Heterogeneous Mixture Miscible Immiscible Soluble Insoluble Solubility Solvent Solute Water is the Universal Solvent Solubility and Temperature