TPT
Total:
$0.00
06 - Projectile Motion Unit Test I Conceptual Physics
06 - Projectile Motion Unit Test I Conceptual Physics
06 - Projectile Motion Unit Test I Conceptual Physics
06 - Projectile Motion Unit Test I Conceptual Physics
06 - Projectile Motion Unit Test I Conceptual Physics
06 - Projectile Motion Unit Test I Conceptual Physics
06 - Projectile Motion Unit Test I Conceptual Physics
06 - Projectile Motion Unit Test I Conceptual Physics
Share

Description

Fully editable, NGSS/modeling pedagogy aligned test! Tests consist of 4 pages total, with two pages worth of multiple choice questions and two pages worth of free response questions. Tests are used for students to demonstrate mastery of learning targets outlined in the corresponding curriculum guide by deployIng models developed from inquiry labs, utilized in problem solving on worksheets, and assessed on quizzes. Unit Tests are summative assessments for teachers to gauge a student’s level of mastery to indicate how to study for final exams.

Learning Targets Assessed:

I know...

  • the definitions of a projectile, fluid resistance, and parabolic motion.
  • the definitions of components, range, and height.

I can...

  • describe how a projectile moves in the horizontal direction.
  • describe how a projectile moves in the vertical component.
  • describe how mass and shape affect the free fall acceleration of a projectile both in air and in a vacuum.
  • calculate range and horizontal velocity.
  • calculate time based on information given for either the horizontal or vertical direction.
  • justify mass independence for free fall acceleration (neglecting air resistance) using a force diagram and net force equation.
  • calculate height and vertical velocity.
  • draw a motion map for a projectile in both the horizontal and vertical direction.

Solutions are included in this purchase!

Report this resource to TPT
Reported resources will be reviewed by our team. Report this resource to let us know if this resource violates TPT's content guidelines.

06 - Projectile Motion Unit Test I Conceptual Physics

Rated 5 out of 5, based on 1 reviews
5.0 (1 rating)
Conceptual Physics
206 Followers
$6.00

Highlights

Digital downloads
Grades icon
Grades
7th - 12th
Standards icon
Standards
Pages
4
Answer Key
Not Included

Save even more with bundles

11 fully editable, NGSS/modeling pedagogy aligned tests! Tests consist of 4 pages total, with two pages worth of multiple choice questions and two pages worth of free response questions. Tests are used for students to demonstrate mastery of learning targets outlined in the corresponding curriculum g
Price $45.00Original Price $68.00Save $23.00
11
21 fully editable, NGSS/modeling pedagogy aligned quizzes, 9 unit tests, 10 writing assignments, and 2 final exams!QuizzesThere are a mix of free-response and multiple-choice questions for most quizzes, which are usually one or two pages long. Quizzes are used for students to demonstrate proficiency
Price $168.75Original Price $203.00Save $34.25
45
*You can request sample previews of resources or units! Please email cris.chacon@knowlesteachers.org to request them. Additionally, upon purchase, please email cris.chacon@knowlesteachers.org to receive immediate access to all of these resources and more through Google Drive Folders and Documents.43
Price $487.50Original Price $977.50Save $490.00
231

Description

Fully editable, NGSS/modeling pedagogy aligned test! Tests consist of 4 pages total, with two pages worth of multiple choice questions and two pages worth of free response questions. Tests are used for students to demonstrate mastery of learning targets outlined in the corresponding curriculum guide by deployIng models developed from inquiry labs, utilized in problem solving on worksheets, and assessed on quizzes. Unit Tests are summative assessments for teachers to gauge a student’s level of mastery to indicate how to study for final exams.

Learning Targets Assessed:

I know...

  • the definitions of a projectile, fluid resistance, and parabolic motion.
  • the definitions of components, range, and height.

I can...

  • describe how a projectile moves in the horizontal direction.
  • describe how a projectile moves in the vertical component.
  • describe how mass and shape affect the free fall acceleration of a projectile both in air and in a vacuum.
  • calculate range and horizontal velocity.
  • calculate time based on information given for either the horizontal or vertical direction.
  • justify mass independence for free fall acceleration (neglecting air resistance) using a force diagram and net force equation.
  • calculate height and vertical velocity.
  • draw a motion map for a projectile in both the horizontal and vertical direction.

Solutions are included in this purchase!

Report this resource to TPT
Reported resources will be reviewed by our team. Report this resource to let us know if this resource violates TPT's content guidelines.

Reviews

5.0
Rated 5 out of 5, based on 1 reviews
1
rating
All verified TPT purchases
Excellent Resource
Rated 5 out of 5
January 13, 2026
Met expectations
Great value
Standards-aligned
Great questions for projectile motion assessment.
Leslie J.
86 reviews • Missouri
Grades taught: 9th

Questions & Answers

Loading

Standards

to see state-specific standards (only available in the US).
Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. Mathematically proficient students start by explaining to themselves the meaning of a problem and looking for entry points to its solution. They analyze givens, constraints, relationships, and goals. They make conjectures about the form and meaning of the solution and plan a solution pathway rather than simply jumping into a solution attempt. They consider analogous problems, and try special cases and simpler forms of the original problem in order to gain insight into its solution. They monitor and evaluate their progress and change course if necessary. Older students might, depending on the context of the problem, transform algebraic expressions or change the viewing window on their graphing calculator to get the information they need. Mathematically proficient students can explain correspondences between equations, verbal descriptions, tables, and graphs or draw diagrams of important features and relationships, graph data, and search for regularity or trends. Younger students might rely on using concrete objects or pictures to help conceptualize and solve a problem. Mathematically proficient students check their answers to problems using a different method, and they continually ask themselves, "Does this make sense?" They can understand the approaches of others to solving complex problems and identify correspondences between different approaches.
Reason abstractly and quantitatively. Mathematically proficient students make sense of quantities and their relationships in problem situations. They bring two complementary abilities to bear on problems involving quantitative relationships: the ability to decontextualize-to abstract a given situation and represent it symbolically and manipulate the representing symbols as if they have a life of their own, without necessarily attending to their referents-and the ability to contextualize, to pause as needed during the manipulation process in order to probe into the referents for the symbols involved. Quantitative reasoning entails habits of creating a coherent representation of the problem at hand; considering the units involved; attending to the meaning of quantities, not just how to compute them; and knowing and flexibly using different properties of operations and objects.
Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. Mathematically proficient students understand and use stated assumptions, definitions, and previously established results in constructing arguments. They make conjectures and build a logical progression of statements to explore the truth of their conjectures. They are able to analyze situations by breaking them into cases, and can recognize and use counterexamples. They justify their conclusions, communicate them to others, and respond to the arguments of others. They reason inductively about data, making plausible arguments that take into account the context from which the data arose. Mathematically proficient students are also able to compare the effectiveness of two plausible arguments, distinguish correct logic or reasoning from that which is flawed, and-if there is a flaw in an argument-explain what it is. Elementary students can construct arguments using concrete referents such as objects, drawings, diagrams, and actions. Such arguments can make sense and be correct, even though they are not generalized or made formal until later grades. Later, students learn to determine domains to which an argument applies. Students at all grades can listen or read the arguments of others, decide whether they make sense, and ask useful questions to clarify or improve the arguments.
Loading