TPT
Total:
$0.00
4.NF.A.1 and 4.NF.A.2 Worksheet (Practice/Homework/Quiz)
Share

Description

This is a worksheet I use in my fourth grade classroom. I used it as a formative assessment to see how students were progressing with fractions. I am in Florida and we use MAFS standards. However, it also lines up with the CCSS.

It can be used for practice, homework, or formative assessments.

This product covers:

CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.4.NF.A.1

Explain why a fraction a/b is equivalent to a fraction (n Γ— a)/(n Γ— b) by using visual fraction models, with attention to how the number and size of the parts differ even though the two fractions themselves are the same size. Use this principle to recognize and generate equivalent fractions.

CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.4.NF.A.2

Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators, e.g., by creating common denominators or numerators, or by comparing to a benchmark fraction such as 1/2. Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two fractions refer to the same whole. Record the results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual fraction model.

MAFS- MAFS.4.NF.1.1

Explain why a fraction a/b is equivalent to a fraction (n Γ— a)/(n Γ— b) by using visual fraction models, with attention to how the number and size of the parts differ even though the two fractions themselves are the same size. Use this principle to recognize and generate equivalent fractions.

MAFS.4.NF.1.2

Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators, e.g., by creating common denominators or numerators, or by comparing to a benchmark fraction such as 1/2. Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two fractions refer to the same whole. Record the results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual fraction model.

Check Out My Blog!

Report this resource to TPT
Reported resources will be reviewed by our team. Report this resource to let us know if this resource violates TPT's content guidelines.

4.NF.A.1 and 4.NF.A.2 Worksheet (Practice/Homework/Quiz)

Rated 4.75 out of 5, based on 4 reviews
4.8Β (4 ratings)
FREE

Highlights

Digital downloads
Grades icon
Grades
4th
Subjects icon
Subjects
Standards icon
Standards
Pages
2
Teaching Duration
30 minutes

Description

This is a worksheet I use in my fourth grade classroom. I used it as a formative assessment to see how students were progressing with fractions. I am in Florida and we use MAFS standards. However, it also lines up with the CCSS.

It can be used for practice, homework, or formative assessments.

This product covers:

CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.4.NF.A.1

Explain why a fraction a/b is equivalent to a fraction (n Γ— a)/(n Γ— b) by using visual fraction models, with attention to how the number and size of the parts differ even though the two fractions themselves are the same size. Use this principle to recognize and generate equivalent fractions.

CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.4.NF.A.2

Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators, e.g., by creating common denominators or numerators, or by comparing to a benchmark fraction such as 1/2. Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two fractions refer to the same whole. Record the results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual fraction model.

MAFS- MAFS.4.NF.1.1

Explain why a fraction a/b is equivalent to a fraction (n Γ— a)/(n Γ— b) by using visual fraction models, with attention to how the number and size of the parts differ even though the two fractions themselves are the same size. Use this principle to recognize and generate equivalent fractions.

MAFS.4.NF.1.2

Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators, e.g., by creating common denominators or numerators, or by comparing to a benchmark fraction such as 1/2. Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two fractions refer to the same whole. Record the results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual fraction model.

Check Out My Blog!

Report this resource to TPT
Reported resources will be reviewed by our team. Report this resource to let us know if this resource violates TPT's content guidelines.

Reviews

4.8
Rated 4.75 out of 5, based on 4 reviews
4
ratings
All verified TPT purchases
Rated 4 out of 5
November 30, 2021
My students were engaged using this resource during independent work time.
Kathleen S.
244 reviews
Grades taught: 4th
Rated 5 out of 5
January 25, 2020
This was perfect for my small groups to really reach the struggling students.
Roberta Gauvin
(TPT Seller)
887 reviews
Anchoring Down in Second Grade
Response from
Anchoring Down in Second Grade
(TPT Seller)
Feb 3, 2020
I am so happy to hear this. Thanks for the feedback!
Rated 5 out of 5
September 30, 2019
Just what I needed to use to help my kiddos.
Jessica Beck
(TPT Seller)
364 reviews
Anchoring Down in Second Grade
Response from
Anchoring Down in Second Grade
(TPT Seller)
Oct 22, 2019
Thanks so much for the feedback!
Rated 5 out of 5
March 26, 2018
Just what I needed for small group. Thank you!
Lovissa C.
332 reviews
Anchoring Down in Second Grade
Response from
Anchoring Down in Second Grade
(TPT Seller)
Mar 27, 2018
I am happy to hear it! You're welcome!

Questions & Answers

Loading

Standards

to see state-specific standards (only available in the US).
Explain why a fraction 𝘒/𝘣 is equivalent to a fraction (𝘯 Γ— 𝘒)/(𝘯 Γ— 𝘣) by using visual fraction models, with attention to how the number and size of the parts differ even though the two fractions themselves are the same size. Use this principle to recognize and generate equivalent fractions.
Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators, e.g., by creating common denominators or numerators, or by comparing to a benchmark fraction such as 1/2. Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two fractions refer to the same whole. Record the results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual fraction model.
Loading