Description
This versatile activity offers multiple formats to engage students in critical thinking about mathematical claims:
1. Individual Activity:
Students analyze each task card and type two arguments: one to support and one to counter the claim.
- Optional: Students can share their arguments with classmates or the teacher for discussion.
2. Partner Activity:
Partners split the deck of 20 task cards (10 cards each).
- Partner A reads the claim aloud, and Partner B provides and writes the first argument. Partner A then counters or supports Partner B’s argument.
- Roles switch for each card until all claims are discussed.
- Optional: Review answers as a pair or discuss findings with the class.
3. Group Activity:
Group split the deck of 20 task cards (5-7 cards each).
- Groups of 3–4 evaluate claims collaboratively.
- Roles (Reader, Explainer, Writer) rotate for each task card to ensure active participation.
- Groups decide if the claim is true, false, or situational, providing examples or counterexamples to justify their reasoning.
- Optional: Groups share interesting findings or disagreements in a class discussion.
Highlights
Description
This versatile activity offers multiple formats to engage students in critical thinking about mathematical claims:
1. Individual Activity:
Students analyze each task card and type two arguments: one to support and one to counter the claim.
- Optional: Students can share their arguments with classmates or the teacher for discussion.
2. Partner Activity:
Partners split the deck of 20 task cards (10 cards each).
- Partner A reads the claim aloud, and Partner B provides and writes the first argument. Partner A then counters or supports Partner B’s argument.
- Roles switch for each card until all claims are discussed.
- Optional: Review answers as a pair or discuss findings with the class.
3. Group Activity:
Group split the deck of 20 task cards (5-7 cards each).
- Groups of 3–4 evaluate claims collaboratively.
- Roles (Reader, Explainer, Writer) rotate for each task card to ensure active participation.
- Groups decide if the claim is true, false, or situational, providing examples or counterexamples to justify their reasoning.
- Optional: Groups share interesting findings or disagreements in a class discussion.


