I'm an adamant practitioner of the Montessori Method. Which for me is less about the body of lessons found in my albums, and more about understanding the underlying philosophy. By understanding the method, you can create novel content and activity in following the child (such as some of the material found here). My favorite work is to engage students in simulations. We live history, not study it from a distance.
I employ referent power, seek connection with my students, try to be fair and am almost always calm, teach skills first instead of make assumptions, and lean on the elders of the three year cohort to model and support our classroom culture values. I think I share this responsibility well, as seen in my best years being when I've had 6th years from the beginning.
Practical Life is more than cooking.
We celebrate our achievements.
Positive discipline is the go word. Students are not problems. Problems are the problems (or challenges, rather), and the teacher with a good relationship can work with the child as a team in addressing these challenges. I should be held accountable to the same expectations I ask of students.
My classroom should be a safe place to fail. Most of the personal narratives I share with students regard mistakes I made as a child. I think it takes some of the pressure of students when adults admit they are imperfect, plus a story is a safe place to learn from failure.